john torrison president
The Coachmen's Clubhouse
  • Club History
  • Club Home
  • Club Members
  • Listen with Bill
    • Bill's History
  • Turntable
    • TT History
  • The FlipSide
  • Picturesque!
  • Skips Corner
  • Gulliver's Travels
  • The Club Pub
    • Sucks News
  • Boardroom

The Club PUBlication  02/24/2020

2/24/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture

Receive a check in the mail? Beware

ANN CARRNS
Fraud involving fake checks has mushroomed in recent years, and the victims are often young adults, a new federal analysis found.
​
In fake check schemes, criminals send checks to their victims, who deposit them. The money initially shows up in the victims’ bank accounts. Then the criminals — using a variety of ploys, like phony job offers, persuade the victims to send some of the money back, often by wire transfer or a gift card. The check eventually bounces, leaving the victim owing money to the bank.

​Reports of check fraud have risen 65% since 2015, and the typical loss is about $2,000 the Federal Trade Commission reported this month. People in their 20s are more than twice as likely as those over 30 to report losing money in the schemes, the commission found.

One reason young people may be more likely to become victims is that they are probably less familiar with how paper checks work, experts say. While federal rules require that banks make funds available quickly for withdrawal — usually within a day or two — there can be a delay of several days or even weeks before a check is fully verified.

Also, check ruses often involve an offer of employment, which young adults may find attractive.

In one account detailed in a Better Business Bureau report in 2018, a student in Oakland, Calif., received an offer at her college e-mail address. The message said she could earn $250 a week by driving her car around after having it “wrapped” with an ad for Mountain Dew. (Banks have issued warnings about “shrink wrap” scams.)

She took the job to help pay her tuition, and received a check in the mail for $4,850 — ostensibly to pay for the wrap job. She deposited the check and the next day was able to withdraw $3,500, which she redeposited — as instructed — into a separate bank account held by the “car specialist.”

The student grew suspicious, however, when she received a text message telling her to withdraw an additional $500 and put it on an iTunes gift card, and she reported the situation to the police. The criminal’s bank account had been closed, and the money was gone. Her own bank demanded that she repay the $3,500, so she agreed to an installment plan to pay off her losses.

People fall prey to schemes because of “optimism bias,” a bureau report found; they think typical victims are older, gullible or even stupid and don’t see themselves that way. In truth, the Better Business Bureau report noted, “we are all vulnerable.”


Ann Carrns writes for the New York Times
0 Comments

The Club PUBlication  02/17/2020

2/17/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
Identity theft protection you may not know you already have
While there's no way to eliminate the risk of fraud completely, you can minimize it. 

By Bev O’Shea 
NerdWallet - FEBRUARY 15, 2020 — 8:43A
Picture
A credit freeze is the closest you can come to a rock-solid guarantee that scammers cannot access your personal credit data.
If you are thinking about paying for identity-theft protection, it’s worth checking to see if you already have access to free or deeply discounted monitoring services or recovery help.

Your chances of being affected by a data breach are about 1 in 15 in any single year — and it’s virtually guaranteed that your identity will be compromised sometime in your lifetime, said James E. Lee, chief operating officer of the Identity Theft Resource Center, a nonprofit that assists identity theft victims.

While there’s no way to eliminate the risk completely, you can minimize it.

You can purchase ID theft-protection services, which can cost $200 or more per year. But you may also have access to free or low-cost services you can activate. Sources could include your bank or credit union; your credit card issuers; your employee-benefits plan; your homeowners or renters insurance, and organizations you belong to, such as AAA or AARP.

Also, if you are affected by a data breach, you will likely be offered free credit or identity theft monitoring for a time.

Lee suggests checking your choices, picking the protection you like best and activating it.

On the other end of the spectrum, cybersecurity and ID theft expert Robert Siciliano, head of training at Protect Now, signs up for all the free protection he can get.

“I am of the notion that the more awareness you have, the better,” he says. “I get alerts all the time, and I love that.”

There are two main types of identity-theft protection. The first is monitoring. At its simplest, it notifies you when your credit is checked. It generally goes beyond just credit monitoring and adds things like fraud resolution services or lost wallet protection.

The second type, identity-theft recovery assistance and insurance, is designed to help you clean up the effects of identity theft.

Insurance generally helps victims recover financial losses and money spent as a result of identity theft. Plans can be as different as health insurance policies, Siciliano warns. The types and amounts of coverage vary, and so can the documentation required to access them. Read the terms and conditions or terms of service, and know what receipts or records you might need to provide.

The best way to reduce risk is to make yourself less of a target. A credit freeze is the closest you can come to a rock-solid guarantee that scammers cannot access your personal credit data. Both Lee and Siciliano recommend it as the first line of defense. Other strategies include choosing long passwords, avoiding recycled passwords, and using two-factor authentication when it’s offered.



E-mail: boshea@nerdwallet.com. Twitter: @BeverlyOShea.
0 Comments

The Club PUBlication  02/10/2020

2/10/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture

Antarctica reaches record temperature of 65 degrees

Peninsula is one of world’s fastest-warming regions.

By MATTHEW CAPPUCCI Washington Post

Picture
In this undated file photo, a lonely penguin appears in Antarctica during the southern hemisphere's summer season. The temperature in northern Antarctica hit nearly 65 degrees (18.3 degrees Celsius), a likely heat record on the continent
Just days after the Earth saw its warmest January on record, Antarctica has broken its warmest temperature ever recorded. A reading of 65 degrees was taken at Esperanza Base along Antarctica’s Trinity Peninsula on Thursday, making it the ordinarily frigid contingent’s highest measured temperature in history.

The Argentine research base is on the northern tip of the Antarctic Peninsula. Randy Cerveny, who tracks extremes for the World Meteorological Organization, called Thursday’s reading a “likely record,” although the mark will still have to be officially reviewed and certified.

The balmy reading beats out the previous record of 63.5 degrees, which occurred on March 24, 2015.

The Antarctic Peninsula is one of the fastest-warming regions in the world. In just the past 50 years, temperatures have surged a staggering 5 degrees in response to Earth’s swiftly warming climate. Around 87% of glaciers along the peninsula’s West Coast have retreated in that time, the majority doing so at an accelerated pace since 2008.

The WMO notes that cracks in the Pine Island Glacier “have been growing rapidly” in the past several days, according to satellite imagery.

The recent spate of warmth owes to a ridge of high pressure that has lingered over the region for several days. High-pressure systems feature sinking air, which favors milder temperatures.

It’s been a monumental year for climate extremes, and we’re just over a month into 2020. January was the warmest on record globally, according to atmospheric monitoring group Copernicus, with records shattered in Europe and Asia. A number of locales in Eastern Europe and particularly Russia wound up more than 12-13 degrees above average.

“[This record] doesn’t come as any surprise,” wrote Eric Steig, a glaciologist studying climate change at the University of Washington. “Although there is decade-to-decade variability, the underlying trend across most of the continent is warming.”

He said this record will likely be broken again in the not-so-distant future.

“That warming has been particularly fast on the Antarctic Peninsula — where Esperanza is — in summer [the season they’re now in]. So we can expect these sorts of records to be set again and again, even if they aren’t set every single year.”
​
Additional extreme warmth is likely in the Antarctic Peninsula in the coming days, raising chances of another new high.

0 Comments

The ClubPUBlication   02/03/2020

2/3/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
In epidemics like China's virus outbreak, most economic damage stems from fear
​Economist   FEBRUARY 1, 2020 — 8:33AM
Picture
People wear masks at a street where is selling tourist's souvenir in Hong Kong, Saturday, Feb, 1, 2020.

The Yu Garden, a 16th-century complex of pavilions and ponds in the heart of Shanghai, was all gussied up for the Chinese New Year holiday. Its walkways were bedecked with colorful lanterns, its stalls laden with dumplings, its entrances flanked by dozens of security guards to handle crowds.

Just one thing is missing: people. Fearful of coronavirus, they stayed home.

“I’ll be doing well if I make a few sales today,” says Li Xinming, manager of a silk-scarf shop. Last year Yu Garden attracted 700,000 visitors during the holiday week, peak season for it and its merchants. This year, Li said his losses might wipe out his earnings for months to come.

The question for China, and for the many companies and countries around the world linked to its economy, is whether Li’s travails are indicative of a much broader problem.

The obvious reference point is China’s battle with SARS, another coronavirus, in 2003. Growth slowed sharply at the height of the epidemic but rebounded swiftly after it was contained. Other recent epidemics have reinforced the impression that economists should not be overly worried, so long as good doctors are on the job. Neither avian flu in 2006 nor swine flu in 2009 dimmed the global outlook.

Yet even flint-hearted investors are wondering whether the new epidemic might be worse. Stocks in Hong Kong have fallen by nearly 10% as reported infections have steadily increased. Tremors have also rippled through global markets.

The concern is less the severity of the virus, which seems less lethal than SARS, but rather the nature and potential duration of China’s efforts to bring the outbreak under control. And disruption in China, the world’s second-biggest economy, has global consequences. “It’s not the disease, it’s the treatment,” wrote analysts with Gavekal Dragonomics, a consultancy.

The World Bank has estimated that as much as 90% of the economic damage from epidemics stems from people’s fear of associating with others, which leads offices and stores to close. In China, this is being magnified by the government’s policy of isolating affected areas and limiting interpersonal contact throughout the country. While public-health experts debate whether this is the right approach, economists will count the costs.

The most direct effect is being felt in Hubei province. First Wuhan, its capital, was placed under quarantine. Then the rest of the province, home to nearly 60 million people, was locked down, too. Apart from food trucks and medical supplies, little can enter its cities and villages, and few are permitted to leave. Such a large-scale isolation is unprecedented as a public-health strategy. Economic activity of just about any kind, short of hospital care and movie streaming, has ground to a halt. Hubei generates 4.5% of China’s GDP, so the closure will leave a hole.

Other cities in China may not be under quarantine but that is what life feels like for their residents. Instead of getting together with family and friends, attending temple fairs and going to restaurants — all, depending on where one lives, staples of the holiday — people have shut themselves in. The government has encouraged them to avoid crowds; many need little prodding.

That will be a drag on consumption. The extent of the damage will depend on how long it takes to stop the virus, but the timing is already rotten. Last year retail sales exceeded 1 trillion ($144 billion) yuan during the new-year week, a third more than an average week. This year, sales are sure to fall well short of that.

Some industries are being hit especially hard. The holiday accounted for 9% of China’s box-office revenue last year. This year almost all of the country’s 11,000 cinemas are closed. Spending on domestic tourism during the new-year week reached more than 500 billion yuan last year, about 8% of the annual total. This year, fearful of the virus, people have canceled trips.

There are also worries about how the virus will affect factories and offices. Several major economic centers, including Shanghai and Guangdong province, have extended the New Year holiday by a week, telling companies to wait until Feb. 10 to restart. Chinese businesses are always slow to get back up to speed after the holiday.

The extra week will make them slower, even if some firms such as Tencent, a tech giant, let employees work from home. Moreover, tens of millions of migrant workers, back in their hometowns for the holiday, may wait for the epidemic to recede before crowding onto trains and buses to return to their jobs.

One critical difference compared with SARS is China’s importance for the rest of the world. In 2003, China generated 4% of global GDP. Last year, it was 16%.
​
The slowdown in consumption and the disruption to production will not stop at its borders.

0 Comments

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018

    RSS Feed